Saturday 21 May 2016

Do you believe that citizenship education should be taught in a practical manner?



A new way of teaching citizenship education

The introduction and continuance in schools of a democratic culture forbid dogmatism in any kind of civics education. The methods and approaches chosen are those based on discussion among pupils and between pupils and teachers, and make provision for children and young people to speak and express themselves. Modes of expression may be varied: in addition to oral exchanges, drawings, songs, poems, different kinds of written material are excellent instruments for reflection on citizenship, democracy, justice, freedom and peace.

In a democracy, citizenship education seeks to educate citizens who will be free to make their own judgments and hold their own convictions. Compliance with existing laws should not prevent citizens from seeking and planning better and ever more just laws. Respect for law, which is one of the objectives of civics education, calls not for blind submission to rules and laws already passed but the ability to participate in drawing them up.
One of the practical tasks of citizenship education is therefore to look at the rules governing a school, improve them and reformulate them.
The values transmitted by citizenship education are not dogmatic principles laid down once and for all. A living culture calls for the creation of new values, although they should all be judged by the criterion of respect for others and for human dignity.
Thus, with regard to the laws and values accepted by an entire social group, citizenship education can in no way be a catalogue of set questions and answers. Citizenship education should be the forum which gives rise to and nurtures a genuine culture of discussion. Whatever the problem posed, such as the ongoing development of humanity or the stability of the rule of law, an exchange of ideas, notions, judgments and individual opinions is necessary. Even among young children, dialogue of this kind is possible.
Citizenship education needs also to be taught in ways that bring out the ever-constant link between knowledge and practice.
The interaction between concepts and action gradually produces the ability to think in terms of values and to refer to them. Values are universal when they concern human rights: for example, the values of liberty, dignity, solidarity and tolerance. As they are firmly anchored and promoted in different cultures they can also concern a region of the world or even a special country, nation or religion. All should be made the subject of discussion and reflection and be studied in each course of citizenship education.
In other words, citizenship education is based on knowledge, practice and values that constantly interact. To be precise, let us say that awareness of the necessary reference to values gradually gives rise to practices and action which are themselves related to knowledge and skills about human rights and the institutions that regulate life in society. Pupils benefiting in this way from citizenship education learn step by step that citizenship unfolds and develops in a society imbued with values and in the human community as a whole.

Contributor:

Toyodoor Swaby
4th Year History and Social Studies Student
Bethlehem Moravian College

2 comments:

  1. It is imperative that we as educators of social studies that we find innovitive ways to bring across the content to students in a way that they can lern. We should also be life long learns and keep up to date with current affairs.We should also seek to finf fun and intersting ways to impart knowledge to our students when we teach students should remember what we taught them. Lets move away from the old method chalk and talk and lets us use techonlogy to enhace our lessons.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They are numerous ways of bringing across content to students meaningful. It is necessary as students are able to form meaning connections with the lesson and real life situations. As a result, field trips and scenarios can be played out in the classroom. The chalk and talk is not only required but should be limited to an extent to cater to a more student-centered approach

    ReplyDelete